Quiet down, class. It’s time to review some definitions. This time, let’s focus on current events:
“Black Lives Matter.” Here’s a phrase that has been incorrectly defined with increasing frequency. To insist on the value of African American lives is not to say that “all lives” don’t matter.
Too often, the “all lives” retort is shouted from a car window at BLM protestors, which happened recently in West Hartford. The impetus behind “all lives” is short step away from the “White lives matter” flyer anonymously distributed in Milford three months ago.
A hate crime is an offense based on race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation. That was Connecticut’s legal definition when the first bias crime law was passed in 1988. (I was an initiator of the original hate crime reporting law, and I helped write the statute.)
Cops and GIs are trained to kill, and are supposed to be prepared to be killed in return. This hard fact is part of the job.
Civilians, however, are not trained by their government to kill, not trained to handle weapons, and are not expected to use deadly force. A hate crime is based on animus towards a person because of their intrinsic qualities, not their job.
“Police Bill of Rights.” Responding to criticism of police misconduct, some police unions are promoting a legislative bill of rights. This is a political ploy. Police officers already have a bill of rights. They are the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
What’s needed are strict national standards that govern cop behavior. But Connecticut police officials have been opposing better training for their forces, and they don’t want it implemented by experts outside of law enforcement.
As State Sen. Eric Coleman of Bloomfield has pointed out, a recent study by Central Connecticut State University shows that local police use stun guns during traffic stops three times more frequently on people of color than white people.
“Community Policing.” The anti-racist forces you have seen out in the streets are not primarily calling for better community-police relations (aka “bridging the divide”). Many of us, however, are calling for community control of police.
Police forces, just as military forces, are supposed to be under public authority. The solution to ending deadly police violence goes far beyond putting beat cops in neighborhoods.
Police are not superior to the people in the neighborhoods they patrol. The importance of their jobs does not give them license to dominate Black and Hispanic people. The life and death danger they may face on the job does not justify violations against our security or our civil rights.
Police departments in the United States have become a power unto themselves. Too often they see the population they are supposed to protect as the enemy. They are trained to be “bulletproof warriors,” as was the Minnesota cop who fatally shot Philando Castile.
The power balance between police departments and the public at large– especially in poor neighborhoods, and especially among communities of color– is dangerously unstable. The people should control the police, not the other way around.
That’s all for today. There will be a test on this material. Be careful out there.
The words of Ella Baker have been in my mind recently. Especially these lines: Until the killing of Black men Black mothers sons is as important as the killing of white men white mothers sons, we who believe in freedom cannot rest until it comes. I really don’t believe that whites in America fully understand that and fully understand that Black Lives Matter and that the police cannot be allowed to be the judge, jury and executioner of Black men and women. I have a very hard time believing that the majority of people would even begin to entertain the notion that all lives matter, and would have to ask if this is just another racist put down by whites towards Blacks. Truly if all lives matter there would be as a start no war.
Reblogged this on furbirdsqueerly and commented:
Check out this important article by one of our comrades. Many thanks to Steve for this.