Some Hartford people are pretty desperate for heroes. What other explanation could there be for the recent attempts to glorify gunmaker Samuel Colt? His 19th century factory is now a National Historic Landmark.
Does Colt really deserve all this attention? Or are there others who might better qualify as local heroes in Hartford history?
Interpreting the past is a tricky business, but there are some things we know for sure. Colt started his career by selling hits of nitrous oxide to curious audiences for a cheap high. Eventually he became a “colonel” who never saw battle, and used bribery to secure lucrative government contracts. He sold weapons to both the North and the South in the arms buildup before the Civil War. He sent his last shipment of guns to the South on April 15, 1861, three days after Fort Sumter was fired upon by the Confederate army.
Colt coerced his employees to vote the way he wanted them to, sometimes by stopping the machines and forcing workers to listen to his “suggestions” for which candidates to support. He timed layoffs around elections as a warning to workers that their fate was in his hands. He positioned his secretary at the ballot box where his workmen voted. Colt even kept a secret journal on his employees’ political affiliations, and fired workers who were anti-slavery Republicans.
The colonel was described as an “autocratic maniac” who ran his operation like a Southern plantation. “While Colt’s workers were not legally enslaved, it was always more a matter of degree than kind,” wrote William Hosley in “Colt: An American Legend.”
The young, unmarried women who worked for him were employed to produce ammunition, dangerous jobs that Colt kept a safe distance from his precious weapons factory. For this extremely risky undertaking, the women were paid a fraction of what Colt’s male employees earned.
But it was Samuel Colt’s position on slavery and abolition, the primary moral questions of the day, that became his most shameful legacy. His defenders say Colt actually opposed slavery, citing a vague reference to a speaker who lectured his workers on the subject. But the facts tell a different story.
Colt decried the “Black Republican Devils” he employed, and asked a politician friend to publicly encourage manufacturers to fire employees who supported abolition. Northern business interests “promoted, prolonged and profited from slavery,” according to Complicity, a book written by three Hartford Courant reporters who documented Northerners’ dependence on slavery in building financial empires.
This profit connection was made crystal clear on Dec. 16, 1859, at Hartford’s city hall. The building was packed with local supporters of “states’ rights,” a coded phrase that justified Southern slavery. Southern states were being unjustly attacked “from a class of men at the North who constantly harp at Slavery,” said one speaker. Another used thinly disguised racist rhetoric to make his point. “Lovers of negroes become haters of white men,” former Hartford Mayor William J. Hamersley told the crowd.
William W. Eaton, who later became a U.S. senator, connected the dots when he addressed the crowd of politicians and businessmen. “Look to your pockets,” he told them. “We desire Southern cotton and corn. She is agricultural. She comes to us for her loans, insurance and goods. She is our best customer; and I have yet to learn that a sane business man will kick his best customer out of doors.”
Samuel Colt was one of the principal sponsors of the mass meeting. Colt joined the unanimous vote to condemn abolition and those who were trying to increase the pressure on the South to end slavery.
There are other men and women who might be promoted in his place as hero of Hartford. One contemporary of Samuel Colt was James Pennington, the Hartford minister who was actually a fugitive slave. Pennington risked his life to escape to freedom, then risked it over and over again by advocating abolition from his Talcott Street pulpit.
We can even look within the industrial empire Colt left after his death for likely candidates. There was William C. Beausang, the Colt employee who led more than 100 machinists on strike in 1912 when the company cut workers’ pay in half. And there was Frank S. Cushman, an inspector of .45-caliber pistols in 1918 who was disturbed about the quality of production at the factory. He wrote to his congressman as a whistleblower and was fired on the same day, with no explanation.
Certainly, Rose Santangelo should be considered. Rose was one of 500 workers who, in 1935, risked everything when she went on strike at the Colt factory to win union recognition. With other female strikers, Rose raised funds on downtown street corners and was arrested on the picket line.
And there is Dorothy Rookwood, who left the Jim Crow South to build a decent life in Connecticut. Dorothy and her husband were employees at Colt Firearms and members of the United Auto Workers union in 1986 when they joined 800 co-workers in a walkout that lasted for four years. The National Labor Relations Board declared Colt guilty of unfair labor practices and ordered their reinstatement with back pay. Ultimately, the workers won the longest strike in state history, and ended up buying the company.
Colt supporters can put up as many memorials to the colonel as they want. But let’s get the history straight. Thousands of Hartford people built the industry for which Samuel Colt is given credit. They are the ones who deserve to be remembered.
Thanks for setting the record straight. Like so many others it’s been too easy for me to see what is in plain sight, but not look beneath that surface, to focus on the warmth of my personal interactions and ignore or downplay the racially motivated hatreds and their consequences in the world at large–past or present.
Please receive this Haiku on the occasion of Sam Colt’s April 19th birthday:
Colt was no hero
Sold guns North-South, wrong or
Left gun violence.
New Britain, CT
Can I throw up now?
I love it. Brilliant summary!
I could be wrong, but I don’t think Colt was around for the strike of 1986. BTW, abolitionists, the Black Republicans, were not righteous people. I don’t think you can find any proof to substantiate half of what you say.
So, sarcasm, bad historical knowledge, and I guess more than a touch of racism, “Robert.” The trifecta! The 1950s called, they want your ignorant ass back home.
Once again, self-righteous and history-ignorant liberals of today find it easy to judge the past by today’s advanced standards. As usual, their choice of “demons” is carefully selected to support a spurious narrative.